|
|
| Re: Bicycle crash - what charge ?
| Fri, 9 May 2008 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
|
In news:68is20F2tg1glU1@mid.individual.net,
Phil Allison typed:
> "Ray Murphy"
>>
>>> My original Q still stands as to the actual intention of the odd
>>> wording of section 51A.
>>
>> RM: Bicycles are not treated as vehicles in that section of the
>> Act, so section 51 couldn't be used.
>
> ** Shame about this bit:
>
> " (3) In this section:
>
> "impact" involving a |
|
|
|