Phil Allison wrote:
>
>
>>> The OP and other film makers are NOT part of the news media or
>>> current affairs TV.
>>
>>> Council "filming rights " permits apply to a proposal for a *film
>>> making project* on council controlled land.
>>
>> Have fun explaining how come ACA doesnt need to get any permission,
>> .wit.
> What TV shows like ACA do is not a * film making project *
> carried out on council property.
You dont know that what the OP wants to do is either, .wit.
> Council "filming rights " permits apply to a proposal for a film making project on
> council controlled land.
You dont know that the OP wants to do that, .wit.
> The OP and other film makers are NOT part of the news media or current affairs TV -
> that is a totally spurious analogy.
It aint an 'analogy', .wit.
Its an example of where it doesnt have to be a news event
and even someone as stupid as you should have noticed that
ACA doesnt bother to get council permission before filming.
Neither do tourists either.
|