"dechucka" wrote in message
news:46c1650a$0$22588$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> wrote in message
> news:V0dwi.13825$eY.12695@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>> "Arthur Brain" wrote in message
>> news:1187076770.749085.93910@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>>> On Aug 13, 8:23 am, Arthur Brain wrote:
>>>> > claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>>> > > On Aug 13, 2:08 am, Arthur Brain wrote:
>>>> > > > Bill Ward wrote:
>>>> > > > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:23:00 -0700, Arthur Brain wrote:
>>>> > > > > > You are very confused. Your authors ERRONEOUSLY state:
>>>> > > > > > "Rahmstorf's
>>>> > > > > > reference to the second law of thermodynamics is plainly
>>>> > > > > > wrong. The second
>>>> > > > > > law is a statement about heat, not about energy."
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > A statement about heat IS a statement about energy, because
>>>> > > > > > HEAT IS
>>>> > > > > > ENERGY.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > Relax a bit and slowly read the above again. The fact that
>>>> > > > > heat is a form
>>>> > > > > of energy does not mean that there are not other forms of
>>>> > > > > energy
>>>> >
>>>> > > > Don't change the subject.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > The authors of this "paper" stated quite unequivocally that "Heat
>>>> > > > is
>>>> > > > not energy".
>>>> >
>>>> > > So you admit you can't dispute what Bill is saying here. Right?
>>>> >
>>>> > Bill was off on an irrelevant tangent. But you missed that.
>>>> >
>>>> > *I* started by quoting an error from the "paper" in question.
>>>> > Bill responded with an irrelevancy.
>>>>
>>>> What, now you're pretending to be delusional. Bill responded directly
>>>> to your point.
>>>
>>> Let me see if I can explain this for you :
>>>
>>> *I* pointed out that the "paper" made the incorrect assertion that
>>> "Heat is NOT energy".
>>>
>>> *Bill* responded with "Heat is not the ONLY form of energy".
>>>
>>> As you can see, his response was a non-sequitur.
>>>
>>> As yet, we have no admission from you loonies that the "paper" made an
>>> incorrect assertion - only evasions, attempts to change the subject,
>>> lies, and childish insults.
>>
>> Do you admit that not all forms of energy are heat?
>
> heat is energy but not all energy is heat. A poodle is a dog but not all
> dogs are poodles
Excellent! Now go back to the original quote and you'll see, eventually,
that the authors' statements make perfect sense. Go ahead. Read them.
|