"dechucka" wrote in message
news:46c199a6$0$22599$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Whata Fool" wrote in message
> news:b2m3c3pscjdokng81s1e7v453m9b6i8s1n@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:54:57 +1000, "dechucka"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>what has Al Gore got to do with the paper under discussion being
>>>unscientific and non interesting?
>>
>> The paper would never have been written if it were not for
>> the nonsensical and greatly exaggerated claims by Al.
>
> pity they didn't do a better job
>
>>
>>>> Don't feel bad, a lot of very capable people fell for it, and
>>>> Al is a few hundred million better off, but that's ok.
>>>
>>>You seem to be straying from the subject
>>
>> You should read the paper again, it claims CO2 does little
>> global warming, helping millions shake off the fear of horrible things
>> to come.
>
> it claims a lot of things which it doesn't back up with science. To me the
> unscientific nature of the paper means it is not interesting
This paper is more scientific than anthing you AGWcultist have produced in
20 years and with over 50 billion in resources. The fact is you have no
alternative. You have nothing that provides a scientific basis for your
delusional belief that CO2 can/will increase atmospheric temperatures.
|