"dechucka" wrote in message
news:46c21379$0$22610$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> wrote in message
> news:1187106614.099932.193160@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 14, 3:58 am, "dechucka" wrote:
>>> wrote in message
>>
>>> but as heat is energy than it applies to a form of energy and the
>>> statement
>>> is incorrect. I dismiss the paper because by your own admission they
>>> don't
>>> know what they are talking about
>>
>> AGW theory is so vague and, otherwise, plainly nonsensical that they
>> had no choice but to try to make something of this phantom theory.
>> This paper demonstrates that even when ones bends over backwards to
>> make sense of AGW theory it still never gets beyond ridiculum. AGW
>> theory is not refuted. Instead it is revealed as amorphous nonsense.
>> It's 100% propaganda and 0% science.
>
> Crap, this paper is mumbo jumbo pseudo science.
Really? Then why are you so desperate to dismiss it instead of revealing
its supposed inadequacies? Talk is cheap.
> This is not to say that information supplied on the other side of the
> debate is not also mumbo jumbo pseudo science.
>
> I think I'll stick to the hard science
>
|