To continue on our previous perspective and particularly in light of
visiting academic Barry Rubin's comments regarding hardline Islamic
groups.
The reality that the Scriptures already convey 6 Gematric
possibilities which I have identified from a philosophical perspective
is an issue of transcendance that applies equally to the Koran (ie.
Category of Understanding #348
Nous: 70
Time: 21:55 (24 hrs)
Date: 18 February, 2007
Torah: #40 #50 #100 %81 = #28
Tao: Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Progress
Tetra: #14 - Penetration
) with its arabic script comprising 28 taxonomy language elements
(actually #22 plus #6) as a formula of progression on the #15-#369
perspective introduced under Roman Imperial Governance and State
Religion--simply does not adequately address the issue.
That the Koran cannot in the circumstance be regarded as replacing the
Scriptures.
>From the example below we can deduce that #237 - USE OF FORCE appears
to be the common theme between:
a) King Herod's murderous actions against the children of Bethlehem
derived from a Scribal imperative:
b) #237 with its 24 elements functions as an overlay to John Chapters
18 and 19 regarding Jesus of Nazareth's arrest, trial, progoguing and
crucifixion
c) Philo of Alexander's commentary of the Mysteries appears to relect
this dynamic in Category of Understanding #348 [YASHAB #10 #300 #2 =
#312 to sit down as judge, in ambush, in quiet, to marry, dwell,
inhabit, abide, tarry] in counsel [ie. dwelling place as the
perspective that the Category of Understanding #348 as notionally
represented in Philo of Alexandria's writings has a linkage to the
Julian Calendar on 3, 9 and 10 August et al, and is associated by a
sub-category of understanding to both the #237 - USE OF FORCE and #435
as the Crown of Thorns worn by Jesus of Nazareth]
That the inclusion of Hebrew plus long vowels Final qames He/A (-1),
sere Yod/E (-5), hireq Yod/I (-9), full Holem/O (-60), sureq/U (-300)
as being analogous to the later development of ENGLISH, perhaps is the
central theological issue of the time which was used to resolve the
question of Israel's autonomous sovereignty:
85 : {
'Strong' : "H85",
'Word' : "'Abraham",
'Grapple' : [1,2,100,-1,600],
'Telos' : 702,
'Meaning' : "Contracted from %'ab% (1) and an unused root (probably
meaning to be populous); father of a multitude; Abraham, the later
name of Abram:--Abraham.",
'Link' : [1],
'Scribe' : true
},
"Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to
say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto
you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto
Abraham." [Luke 3:8]
If the articulation of original non-being also finds its attainment in
the One fashioned 'long, long ago' [Heb. QEDEM-Ancient YOM-Times
YATSAR-Determined] "One is the beginning of numbers and the ultimate
number of things. Each thing, as such, is produced by the one [Unity]
and this is why it is the master of them all [Multiplicity]" [#39 -
Achieving Oneness/ The Root of Order], then the issue is readily
understandable as having a scribal basis to the question.
- dolf
PREVIOUS MESSAGE
As you are no doubt aware I have been doing research into the
Mysteries and the possibility that the recognition of the Roman Caesar
as the head of State and Pontifex Maximus during the Christian era is
dependent upon a HETEROS understanding of the Pythagorean (c. 580-500
BCE) conception of Number as a universal and divine HOMOIOTIC
principle which is quite different to the predominately quantitative
understanding of it applied today.
I'm proposing that the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is the encyclical
architecture intrinsic to the BIBLE and commend the following in an
attempt to arrive at a common Gematric form that can be universally
adopted--I wish to use these literary fragments for computer based
decision making.
The difficulty with the present day Scriptures is that there are some
6 Gematric possibilities which I have identified from a philosophical
perspective.
a) Hebrew taxonomy comprising 22 elements
b) Hebrew plus final form of Kaf (#500), Mem (#600), Nun (#700), Pe
(#800), Tsade (#900)
c) Hebrew plus long vowels Final qames He/A (-1), sere Yod/E (-5),
hireq Yod/I (-9), full Holem/O (-60), sureq/U (-300)
d) Hebrew vowel punctuation for transliteration (ignored)
e) Greek pre-400 BCE comprising 27 elements inclusive of letters #6,
#90 and #900
f) Greek post-400 BCE comprising 24 elements excluding letters #6, #90
and #900.
Thus to look at three examples conveyed by Strong's reference H17, H18
and H19:
In the first instance the Hebrew word "'aboy" has a long vowel form
'full holem' which is computed as minus 60. Giving the total Gematric
value minus 47. Which equates notionally to 'Ignorant guides, viewing
the distant'
And in the second example the Hebrew word "'ebus" has a long vowel
form 'sureq' which is computed as minus 300. Giving the total
Gematric value minus 237. Which equates notionally to 'Use of force'
The third example the Hebrew word "'ibchah" conveying a final qames he
represents either (1) a consonantal he in a nominal form, (2) a weak
third radical in the standard dictionary form {male} of a verb or, (3)
the feminine {female} singular ending. Giving the total Gematric
value of 10. Which equates to the Decalgoue.
17 : {
'Strong' : "H17",
'Word' : "'aboy",
'Grapple' : [1,2,-60,10],
'Telos' : -47,
'Meaning' : "From %'abah% (14) (in the sense of desiring); want:--
sorrow.",
'Link' : [14],
'Scribe' : true
},
18 : {
'Strong' : "H18",
'Word' : "'ebus",
'Grapple' : [1,2,-300,60],
'Telos' : -237,
'Meaning' : "From %'abas% (75); a manger or stall:--crib.",
'Link' : [75],
'Scribe' : true
},
19 : {
'Strong' : "H19",
'Word' : "'ibchah",
'Grapple' : [1,2,8,-1],
'Telos' : 10,
'Meaning' : "From an unused root (apparently meaning to turn);
brandishing of a sword:--point.",
'Scribe' : true
},
That this Gematric approach appears to remain consistent with the New
Testament era perspectives: "Then Herod {son of a hero}, when he saw
that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent
forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem {house of
bread}, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under,
according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise
men. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah {exaltation
of the Lord; Jeremai, my height; throwing forth waters} the prophet,
saying,
In Rama {raised; lofty: notionally represented by #348 = #2 #90 #200
#6 #50 Citadel, fortress} was there a voice heard, lamentation, and
weeping, and great mourning, Rachel {sheep} weeping for her children,
and would not be comforted, because they are not.
But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth in a
dream to Joseph {increase; addition} in Egypt {that troubles or
oppresses; anguish},
Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into
the land of Israel {He that sees God; He that prevails with God}: for
they are dead which sought the young child's life.
And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into
the land of Israel." [Matthew 2:16-21]
|