On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:36:29 -0700, Whata Fool wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:53:15 -0700, "Phil." wrote:
>
>>Using such a model that's far from the earth's reality and then using its
>>unreal results to suggest that they somehow show that the averaging is
>>invalid seems like a crock to me!
>
> Maybe it was hard to follow, sometimes language differences
> can be less than helpful.
>
> Since a word for word translation doesn't work, the
> translator may have lost track of the discussion (if there was
> translation).
I'm hoping people will read the paper and decide for themselves. It's not
hard to follow, as the authors explain their work as they go. I'd take
some of the homegrown examples (car interior, pot boiling) with a grain of
salt, but the paper makes many very good points.
>
> But there is a lot in the paper, it might not warrant a
> total dismissal even if part doesn't make sense.
|