On Jan 13, 5:31=A0pm, kangarooistan wrote:
> On Jan 13, 1:40 pm, "Swampfox" wrote:
> > "kangarooistan" wrote
>
> > > No native people started off hating white people ,
> > > but after seeing them in action , its not surprising > > > to assume w=
hite people are evil
>
Well they made a mistake then! Not all white people are evil, but all
peoples, no matter the colour of their skins or their knowledge etc,
make mistakes from time to time.
> > > I see GS , seems to think caring for them =A0as
> > > they are killed off slowly removes guilt
> > > GS is going to take time for her to admit she was
> > > used
There was/is no killing off of all Aborigines, slowly or quickly,
either in the past or the present. The fact that there is still a
population of Aborigines, mostly part Aborigines, but no dishonour in
that, (many of us have more than one ethnic group in out ancestry) and
some full blood Aborigines.
I don't like your attitude. I was not used. I gave my assistance on a
voluntary basis. What you are doing, in your campaign of hatred, is to
ascribe to all others wrong intentions, and in that you are the person
who is wrong.
What you will not accept is that there are many Aborigines in
Austra;ia today who are better off because the English came here just
over 200 years ago, and that despite certain problems that did occur
during that period.
>
I would think it was sometime in the early 1970's that another teacher
asked me what I knew about Aborigines and how they were living at that
time. I only knew about the Aborigines who were being helped by
Christians.
Her question evidently had political overtones in it, as it was in
1976 that Aboriginal issues in their negative sense were featured in
Sydney's media. That media was evidently not interested to give any
of the positive aspects. I say 'evidently' because it was impossible
for me to cover all media outlets.
In hindsight, I would say there could have been implications in it for
making Australia a Republic as a start to bringing about an end to the
British Monarchy as that issue also became one of public debate.
My assessment now is that Republicanism was a movement by some of the
Roman Catholic religion for their own desired ends of reversing the
Reformation that came about because of the false teachings of the
Popes even before Luther's work in Germany.
If my assessment is correct there were movements within movements -
the obvious hiding the not so obvious - so that people would be lulled
into accepting what political expediency was directing.
>
> > > Thank god THE MUSLIMS WILL END THEIR MURDEROUS PLANS
> > > ONCE AND FOR ALL TIME.
>
Why don't you say 'Allah' because it is to Allah, the moon god, that
Muslims direct heir prayers. The Muslim faith is a use of some
Biblical scriptures with some additions of Muhammed's own devising.
Jesus Christ is the answer to the world's and individual's
problems.
Comparison between Muhammed and Jesus
www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/compare.htm
The most important aspect of this discussion is whose teachings are
better: Muhammed or Jesus.
I'll chose the teachings of Jesus everyday.
Gladys Swager |