In article <478abb65$0$31016$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Sylvia
Else wrote:
> Ronald Huttner wrote:
>> In article <478ab454$0$8437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Sylvia
>> Else wrote:
>>> Ronald Huttner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's agree to disagree.
>>>> I will continue to write "ad hominem".
>>>> And you will continue to rave on "ad nauseam".
>>>> That won't require you to change a thing.
>>
>>> Fine - but you'll still get annoyed when I won't respond in
>>> substance to your posts when they contain ad hominem attacks.
>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> Are we now agreed that you DO, in fact, write ad nauseam ?
>> Excellent !
>>
> I wondered whether you'd want to treat my response as agreement with
> all your assertions. I rather expected that you would. Seems I was
> right.
> Sylvia.
As a person with huge and obvious legal talent, you MUST know that you
have NOT answered my question.Stop "wondering" and answer it !
Any reply from you referring yet again to "ad hominem" attacks will
be automatically and immediately trashed.
|