In news:nemoMon011408071845@news.netspace.net.au,
Ronald Huttner typed:
> In article "Oksana
> Gutteridge" wrote:
>> This, however, is Usenet. The only thing that counts here (if
>> anything counts) is the quality of the argument. Claimed
>> qualifications, knowledge and skill mean nothing.
>
> Dear Oksana Gibberish/Garbage
> Sure, sure. And the quality of your argument on this caveat matter has
> to date been absolutely zero - because you have yet to present
> anything that even remotely resembles an argument.You haven't advanced
> beyond insults yet.
> By the way, I have conducted numerous cases before the Federal Court,
> the AAT etc over the years, so am certainly able to argue the law.
> Have you ? Can you ?
The answers to your questions are "Yes" and "Yes". But this means nothing.
You have made my point. Such claims are meaningless here - they are a claim
to give a superior quality to responses, which is nonsense. Even the RVI
gets it occasionally right, and it has no legal knowledge, legal skills, or
any knowledge or skills of any other kind for that matter.
The reason I did not engage in any discussion about caveats is that it was
pointless for the OP. In the context, there is no problem in the OP lodging
a caveat, because the OP's former partner would not go to the trouble and
cost of legal action of removing it. What you were suggesting in this
respect was plainly irrelevant nonsense.
If I am wrong in guessing the reaction of the OP's former partner to the
caveat, the threat of legal action would be enough to cause the OP to lift
the caveat. But I am not wrong.
There is every reason for the OP to protect their interest by lodging a
caveat. Whether there is a caveatable interest is irrelevant, in the real
world.
In addition, it should be understood that any advice given to any poster
here is based on what the poster says, which means that neither the
information put forward and the advice given should be taken with extreme
scepticism. Any poster has to decide their own course of action, and should
never rely on any advice given here.
In short, you have unequivocally demonstrated yourself to be a silly,
little, posturing, irrelevant wanker, and you really don't have any idea
what you are taking about. It is not abuse, Ron Ron. You have done it
yourself. I am sure that you have done it many times before, but perhaps
not quite so publicly and permanently. And you are now hooked, but you have
nowhere to go. Tough luck, Ron Ron!
|