"Enough Already" wrote in message
news:25919667-cc5c-4eb8-8814-bdbfda6309d7@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 2, 6:17 pm, "Green Turtle" wrote:
> What is different, and as his newspaper post shows, is that there are
> hundreds of people and many people who are of scientific reason and
> knowledge that do not simply agree with the conclusion of AGW being a
> cause
> for alarm.
But the majority of them are the same ones who deny every
environmental problem that comes down the pike. Years later, they
claim in hindsight that things would have been fixed without any
"alarmism."
*****
ROTFLMAO.
The global cooling "problem" of the seventies didn't require "fixing"
did it?
And aren't we all glad they didn't "fix" it, eh?
Likewise, the current global warming "problem" will soon rectify itself
once the new global cooling trend becomes entrenched.
Alarmists like our friends Coppcock and
"Still-Flogging-Dead-Horse-Socialism" Fran will soon be shivering in
their winter woolies whilst they try to invent a new story to scare the
crap out of the easily-fooled "masses".
Regards
Bonzo
"Attributing global climate change to human CO2 production is akin to
trying to diagnose an automotive problem by ignoring the engine
(analogous to the Sun in the climate system) and the transmission (water
vapour) and instead focusing entirely, not on one nut on a rear wheel,
which would be analogous to total CO2, but on one thread on that nut,
which represents the human contribution." Dr. Timothy Ball, Chairman of
the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (NRSP.com), Former Professor
Of Climatology, University of Winnipeg
|