Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Subject: Re: Economics of abuse child and father Posted on: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:07:22 EST

In article <20080327145456.AFB4D1A788A@isole>, cripto@ecn.org writes...

>
> "David Moss" wrote in message news:MPG.22562606a798d0a298b342@news.bigpond.com...
> > In article , q0320811
> > @mail.connect.usq.edu.au writes...
> >
> >>
> >> > >> No. But originally they were father mother and children family. Declaring that Minister for Family and her 2 dogs are equal family is insane.
> >> > >
> >
> > Gosh, the remailer mob *can* think ahead.
> > Its obvious where this thread is going and its just too painful.
> >
>
> Is it painful for you to not get answer from Mr. Rem Ailer?
>
> Insomnia?
>
> Relax. Have a cuppa. Smell the roses.
>
> Family is still mother + father + children.
>
> Marriage is for life, just as in Australian law.

If you are trying to smell the roses, I suggest you lift your nose a
little further from the bullshit they are growing in.

According to Relationships Australia more than a third of marriages in
Australia at least one of the partners has been married before.

--
DM
Eristic extraordinaire
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com