On Tue, 06 May 2008 04:21:49 -0700, Fran wrote:
> On May 6, 8:41 pm, Polly the Parrot
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Fran
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So whatever happened and whoever did what, it was considered
>> > inoffensive by those there.
>>
>> > That makes it neither 'perverted' nor .ual harassment.
>>
>> Not correct.
>
> It is correct
>
>> It may not appear "perverted" to the recipient (he probably had just
>> finished giving her a quick knee trembler in the toilet block), but if
>> I was there ...
>
> But you weren't there, so the standard is not relevant. None of the
> people there claim to be offended.
Carpenter was there, and apparently is, and therefore would have been,
offended.
|