On May 7, 3:04 pm, Horry wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 04:21:49 -0700, Fran wrote:
> > On May 6, 8:41 pm, Polly the Parrot
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Fran
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > So whatever happened and whoever did what, it was considered
> >> > inoffensive by those there.
>
> >> > That makes it neither 'perverted' nor .ual harassment.
>
> >> Not correct.
>
> > It is correct
>
> >> It may not appear "perverted" to the recipient (he probably had just
> >> finished giving her a quick knee trembler in the toilet block), but if
> >> I was there ...
>
> > But you weren't there, so the standard is not relevant. None of the
> > people there claim to be offended.
>
> Carpenter was there, and apparently is, and therefore would have been,
> offended.
I agree, carpenters are normally very thin-skinned. Plumbers on the
other hand, can take the shit. |