"Phil Allison" wrote in message
news:68is20F2tg1glU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Ray Murphy"
>>
>>> My original Q still stands as to the actual intention of the odd
>>> wording of section 51A.
>>
>> RM: Bicycles are not treated as vehicles in that section of the
>> Act, so section 51 couldn't be used.
>
> ** Shame about this bit:
RM: No, it's not a shame at all - you just got it wrong
again - presumably to fit in with your incessant trolling activities.
> " (3) In this section:
>
> "impact" involving a vehicle includes:
> (a) an impact with any other vehicle or with a person or object, "
-------
RM: As I said earlier - a bicycle is not a vehicle for the
purposes of S.51. Bicycles are expressly excluded.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Section 52
(9) Definitions In this section:
"vehicle" means:
(a) any motor car, motor carriage, motor cycle or other vehicle
propelled wholly or partly by volatile spirit, steam, gas, oil,
electricity, or by any other means OTHER than human or animal power,
or
(b) a horse-drawn vehicle,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ray
|