|
| Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
|
Posted on: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:54:10 +0000 (UTC)
|
In news:68u72vF2uvvg1U1@mid.individual.net,
Rod Speed typed:
> Horry wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Horry wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> Fun Tyme wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> Sir John Howard wrote
>
>>>>>>> That we wont see that stuff he listed.
>
>>>>>>> Even the dud and that fool swan wont be able to . the
>>>>>>> current economy, you watch.
>
>>>>>>> It wont even be as much of a horror budget as Howard
>>>>>>> and Costello had with their first budget either.
>
>>>>>>> And it was always terminally stupid to be handing out baby
>>>>>>> bonuses and child payments etc to the middle class and the
>>>>>>> higher income earners.
>
>>>>>>> And distinctly arguable if it makes any sense to be having the
>>>>>>> brat bonus to the dregs of society in spades.
>
>>>>>> Quite distinct !
>
>>>>>> This baby bonus bullshit is the perfect start for a LIFETIME of
>>>>>> welfare support for shit kids of shit welfare bludging parents.
>
>>>>> Gunna be interesting to see how much of that we get with the
>>>>> lowest unemployment rate for 35+ years, if we do manage to keep
>>>>> that until they are old enough to work.
>
>>>>>> A cash reward for being useless.
>
>>>>> And with the worst of them it basically pays for the drugs their
>>>>> useless .wit 'parents' are ingesting.
>
>>>> And the drug dealers use their profits to purchase luxury cars
>>>> (such as the Lexus LS Saloon and the S-type Jaguar) -- both of
>>>> which will be subject to Swan's new luxury car tax of 33%.
>
>>> No drug dealer will give a flying red . about that.
>
>> True, but they'll still be paying the higher 33% tax on their luxury
>> automobiles
>
> Nope, their customers will.
>
>> with leather upholstry, woodgrain trim, and inbuilt surround-sound
>> ghettoblasters. That new tax will generate more than enough additional
>> revenue to
>> cover the cost of the baby bonuses paid to .wit druggy parents.
>
> Wrong again.
>
>>>> So it's really a win-win-win situation. The .wit parents get
>>>> their drugs, the dealers get their luxury sedans, and we
>>>> eventually get our money back.
>
>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.
>
>> Those of us who pay tax will get the money back in the form of tax
>> cuts
>
> Wrong again. You are just getting the result of inflation back in the
> form of tax cuts.
Wrong. The surpluses enabling all those tax cuts are *not* the result of
inflation.
|
239897. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239901. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239902. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239904. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239908. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239912. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239916. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239922. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239928. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
239931. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239935. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239936. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
|
|
| |