|
| Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
|
Posted on: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:10:23 +1000
|
TomTom wrote:
> In news:68u72vF2uvvg1U1@mid.individual.net,
> Rod Speed typed:
>> Horry wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Horry wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Fun Tyme wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> Sir John Howard wrote
>>
>>>>>>>> That we wont see that stuff he listed.
>>
>>>>>>>> Even the dud and that fool swan wont be able to . the
>>>>>>>> current economy, you watch.
>>
>>>>>>>> It wont even be as much of a horror budget as Howard
>>>>>>>> and Costello had with their first budget either.
>>
>>>>>>>> And it was always terminally stupid to be handing out baby
>>>>>>>> bonuses and child payments etc to the middle class and the
>>>>>>>> higher income earners.
>>
>>>>>>>> And distinctly arguable if it makes any sense to be having the
>>>>>>>> brat bonus to the dregs of society in spades.
>>
>>>>>>> Quite distinct !
>>
>>>>>>> This baby bonus bullshit is the perfect start for a LIFETIME of
>>>>>>> welfare support for shit kids of shit welfare bludging parents.
>>
>>>>>> Gunna be interesting to see how much of that we get with the
>>>>>> lowest unemployment rate for 35+ years, if we do manage to keep
>>>>>> that until they are old enough to work.
>>
>>>>>>> A cash reward for being useless.
>>
>>>>>> And with the worst of them it basically pays for the drugs their
>>>>>> useless .wit 'parents' are ingesting.
>>
>>>>> And the drug dealers use their profits to purchase luxury cars
>>>>> (such as the Lexus LS Saloon and the S-type Jaguar) -- both of
>>>>> which will be subject to Swan's new luxury car tax of 33%.
>>
>>>> No drug dealer will give a flying red . about that.
>>
>>> True, but they'll still be paying the higher 33% tax on their luxury
>>> automobiles
>>
>> Nope, their customers will.
>>
>>> with leather upholstry, woodgrain trim, and inbuilt surround-sound
>>> ghettoblasters. That new tax will generate more than enough
>>> additional revenue to
>>> cover the cost of the baby bonuses paid to .wit druggy parents.
>>
>> Wrong again.
>>
>>>>> So it's really a win-win-win situation. The .wit parents get
>>>>> their drugs, the dealers get their luxury sedans, and we
>>>>> eventually get our money back.
>>
>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.
>>
>>> Those of us who pay tax will get the money back in the form of tax
>>> cuts
>>
>> Wrong again. You are just getting the result of inflation back in the
>> form of tax cuts.
> Wrong.
We'll see...
> The surpluses enabling all those tax cuts are *not* the result of inflation.
Inflation is what increases the tax take that needs tax cuts to return
to the level of taxation before the inflation happened, .wit.
|
239897. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239901. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239901. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239902. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239904. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239904. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239908. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239912. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239916. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239916. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239931. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
239935. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239935. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239936. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
|
|
| |