|
| Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
|
Posted on: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
|
In news:68ule8F2v1ojqU1@mid.individual.net,
Rod Speed typed:
> TomTom wrote:
>> In news:68u72vF2uvvg1U1@mid.individual.net,
>> Rod Speed typed:
>>> Horry wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> Horry wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> Fun Tyme wrote
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>> Sir John Howard wrote
>>>
>>>>>>>>> That we wont see that stuff he listed.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even the dud and that fool swan wont be able to . the
>>>>>>>>> current economy, you watch.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> It wont even be as much of a horror budget as Howard
>>>>>>>>> and Costello had with their first budget either.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> And it was always terminally stupid to be handing out baby
>>>>>>>>> bonuses and child payments etc to the middle class and the
>>>>>>>>> higher income earners.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> And distinctly arguable if it makes any sense to be having the
>>>>>>>>> brat bonus to the dregs of society in spades.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Quite distinct !
>>>
>>>>>>>> This baby bonus bullshit is the perfect start for a LIFETIME of
>>>>>>>> welfare support for shit kids of shit welfare bludging parents.
>>>
>>>>>>> Gunna be interesting to see how much of that we get with the
>>>>>>> lowest unemployment rate for 35+ years, if we do manage to keep
>>>>>>> that until they are old enough to work.
>>>
>>>>>>>> A cash reward for being useless.
>>>
>>>>>>> And with the worst of them it basically pays for the drugs their
>>>>>>> useless .wit 'parents' are ingesting.
>>>
>>>>>> And the drug dealers use their profits to purchase luxury cars
>>>>>> (such as the Lexus LS Saloon and the S-type Jaguar) -- both of
>>>>>> which will be subject to Swan's new luxury car tax of 33%.
>>>
>>>>> No drug dealer will give a flying red . about that.
>>>
>>>> True, but they'll still be paying the higher 33% tax on their
>>>> luxury automobiles
>>>
>>> Nope, their customers will.
>>>
>>>> with leather upholstry, woodgrain trim, and inbuilt surround-sound
>>>> ghettoblasters. That new tax will generate more than enough
>>>> additional revenue to
>>>> cover the cost of the baby bonuses paid to .wit druggy parents.
>>>
>>> Wrong again.
>>>
>>>>>> So it's really a win-win-win situation. The .wit parents get
>>>>>> their drugs, the dealers get their luxury sedans, and we
>>>>>> eventually get our money back.
>>>
>>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.
>>>
>>>> Those of us who pay tax will get the money back in the form of tax
>>>> cuts
>>>
>>> Wrong again. You are just getting the result of inflation back in
>>> the form of tax cuts.
>
>> Wrong.
>
> We'll see...
Not until you get those eyes tested again.
>> The surpluses enabling all those tax cuts are *not* the result of
>> inflation.
>
> Inflation is what increases the tax take that needs tax cuts to return
> to the level of taxation before the inflation happened, .wit.
Bull-shit. There is something beyond Home Economics 101, fool.
|
239897. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239901. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239901. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239902. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239904. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239904. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239908. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239912. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239916. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239916. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
239935. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
239935. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families!
239936. Re: KRudd says budget will be a labour one! Bye, bye working families
|
|
| |