In article <6977ksF31dcmfU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Reality_Check©" wrote:
> "Larry" wrote in message
> news:x-464C2C.01020917052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > In article ,
> > richard wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 15 May 2008 15:16:48 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a Missouri
> >> >woman
> >> >Thursday for her alleged role in perpetrating a hoax on the online
> >> >social
> >> >network MySpace against a 13-year-old neighbor who committed suicide.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok let's clarify this a bit more. From what I have read online is, the
> >> indictment has not yet been granted. It is only a request by two
> >> unnamed federal agents from Los Angeles.
> >
> > You've read wrong. The grand jury voted the indictment already - as the
> > very first sentence of the story you replied to stated.
> >
> > For further proof, a copy of the indictment is here:
> >
> > http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/15/my.space.drew.indictment.pd
> > f
> >
> > (This copy does not have the grand jury foreperson's signature, likely
> > to protect their anonymity.)
> >
> >
> >> The suicide, and crime took place in 2006.
> >> The state of Missouri did not see there was enough evidence to charge
> >> anyone with anything.
> >> So now there is sufficient evidence on the federal level?
> >
> > Yes, because different laws are involved. Missouri authorities
> > investigated the case but determined that no Missouri law applied to
> > these facts. The feds investigated the case, and they determined that
> > there were several federal laws that this woman violated.
> >
> >> Can someone please inform us under exactly which law the indictment
> >> will be granted? If it is granted, I for one am gonna bitch like holy
> >> hell.
> >
> > You always bitch, Richard. And you're always on the wrong side of the
> > issue.
>
> ROTFLMAO !!
Seriously, get help. You can't refrain from responding to a post of
mine, can you? |