Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In , on
> 05/19/2008
> at 06:44 PM, MB said:
>
>> The name I am using is not real, no way would I use a real name of
>> email. Imagine all the spam!! Totally ridiculous case. Everyone
>> who violates a TOS (who reads these anyways?? NO ONE!) that states
>> you cant mislead will be guilty of using a false name,
>
> ROTF,LMAO! If you can't be bothered to read your provider's AUP/TOS,
What makes you think an AU Policy should have criminal penalties?
> then you should take the responsibility for the consequences. And
> even if *YOU* don't know how to add a few words to your sig[1],
> plenty of others do.
So you support the Criminal prosecution of ISP's that violate their
own AUP/TOS, eh?
>
>> If she was charged with child abuse I would be happy, instead of this
>> horrid precedent!!
>
> A conviction would not be a horrible precedent, although I certainly
> wouldn't mind seeing a conviction on multiple charges.
So you support the criminal prosecutions and any convictions against
the U$ Telecoms who violated their Terms of Service by disclosing
millions of private party records to the Criminal Bu$h Administration, eh?
NOTE: By replying to this posting you agree to be bound by the
following Use Policy / Contract --
1) You, the respondant, must only type with your right hand.
2) You, the respondant, must ram a dildo up your ass with
your left hand whilst typing.
3) Failure to abide by this contract shall be deemed a Felony
4) If you don't agree to the above, then don't reply.
Now take Dick Cheney's advice and go . yourself, jackass.
|