On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:30:35 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:
>Andy wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:20:22 +1000, Sylvia Else
>> wrote:
>>
>>> TG'sFM wrote:
>>>> On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> TG'sFM wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 20, 10:18 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>> Critics say Street View can catch people in compromising positions and
>>>>>>>> is open to abuse by criminals, who can map escape routes.
>>>>>>>> The photograph can be downloaded or copied before it is removed.
>>>>>>>> "Once your privacy is lost you can never ever get it back and that's why
>>>>>>>> it's so important to ensure there's no chance of that happening in the
>>>>>>>> first place," civil liberties expert Cameron Murphy said.
>>>>>>> Something of an overreaction, IMHO. It's not as if there's anything to
>>>>>>> stop a crim from driving down the street and taking their own
>>>>>>> photographs. It's hard to imagine a house being so manifestly vulnerable
>>>>>>> that crims will notice it on random browsing of Google's database.
>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>> You're assuming that every crim has a car and a camera. That is
>>>>>> simply not the case.
>>>>> How do you reach that conclusion?
>>>> Because you said there is nothing stopping a crim from driving down
>>>> the street taking his own photos. I don't think it's too hard to
>>>> understand that to do that, you'd need both a car and a camera. Hope
>>>> that helps.
>>> Did I save drive in a car? A crim who wants to drive down a street and
>>> take photographs has to have access to something capable of being
>>> driven, such as a car,
>>
>>> motorbike,
>>
>> Motorbikes are ridden, not driven.
>
>Then why do you need a driving licence?
You're a semantic arguing idiot Sylvia.
>
>>
>>> or flock of sheep, and a camera.
>>
>> The only way to drive a flock of sheep is to stick em on the back of a
>> truck and drive the truck.. and even then, you're still not "driving"
>> the sheep.
>
>http://www.answers.com/topic/drover
>
>"One that drives cattle or sheep."
You're a semantic arguing idiot Sylvia.
>>
>>> That's not the same as having them. There's nothing to stop a crim from
>>> having access.
>>
>> You just can't stand it when you're wrong can you?
>
>Oh, I cope.
>
>Sylvia.
No, fact remains that you just can't stand it when you're wrong.
QED |