dolf wrote:
> I have every intention of pursuing a legal claim of religious, racial
> and .ual vilification against the Victorian Equal Opportunity and
> Human Rights Commission--those documents were served on the Commission
> on 21 July 2008.
You start a sentence citing 'intention' and finish it claiming that you
have already done it?
>
> That your conduct is symptomatic of a lack of respect for the superior
> autonomic right of the Dutch by British colonization--the inequality
> of Aboriginals is symptomatic of it.
>
> That the fascist dog B J Foster needs to be brought to heal.
Easy, just killfile the fascist dog.
>
> - dolf
*plonk*
>
> On Jul 25, 8:55 am, B J Foster wrote:
>> dolf wrote:
>>> Should you continue with your Internet based hate speech as the
>>> fascist rabid dog that you are--a legal claim will be pursued.
>> Oh FFS, stop top posting you idiot!
>>
>> Claim? On what basis? For pointing out that you can't follow protocol
>> and post gibberish?
>>
>> ROTFL
>>
>>> On Jul 25, 8:28 am, dolf wrote:
>>>> Do cease the need to tag each of my discussion threads with your
>>>> derangement.
>>>> On Jul 25, 8:26 am, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>> You are eranged. Try to comply with reasonable requests to follow
>>>>> protocol. Thank you.
>>>>> dolf wrote:
>>>>>> Well if it isn't the fascist dog B J Foster!
>>>>>> Is your church wedding driving you to evil compulsion?
>>>>>> B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>> You got that the wrong way around, it should read:
>>>>>>> 'Do cease the need^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b to tag each of my^b^bpublic
>>>>>>> derangementdiscussion^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b threads with your
>>>>>>> derangement^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^bdiscussion'.
>>>>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>>>> It's a question of monogamous cyrrhosis chronically asphyxiated by
>>>>>>> religious motivated mongrelised anglo-celtic hetero.uals, isn't it?
>>>>>>> dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> Do cease the need to tag each of my discussion threads with your
>>>>>>>> derangement.
>>>>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 9:57 pm, Polly the Parrot
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:54:21 -0700 (PDT) dolf
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I have with respect to those matters in relation to a PRIVATE PARKING
>>>>>>>>>> RIGHT particularized with document dated 14 July 2008 and signed 17
>>>>>>>>>> July 2008 has by now been served
>>>>>>>>> So where exactly is this private parking place of yours?
>>>>>>>>> And stop top posting, you uneducated cretin!
> |