On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:46:27 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
wrote:
>forevernitefan wrote:
>> On Aug 27, 11:54 am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>> On Aug 27, 3:20 am, "Robert D." wrote:
>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>> h.. One mail is enough
>>>>>>> We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within
>>>>>>> 24 hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
>>>>>>> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up
>>>>>>> but just give us more work.
>>>
>>>>>> ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
>>>>>> imbecile.
>>>
>>>>> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>>>
>>>> He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is.
>>>
>>> Who's "Eric Ross" ?
>>
>> You. Having idenity problems agian?
>>
>>>
>>>> It's also why he's using
>>>> both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms. He hides behing a
>>>> proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
>>>> cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.
>>>
>>> Who's "someone", eh coward.
>>
>> Any person who might have had enoughof you to track you down for a
>> physical meeting. Jonesie.
>
>And who would that be, eh coward?
Any number of people may be so motivated.
>
>
>> As for me being a coward, how ironic since
>
>You're too cowardly to "track me down" even though
>you and Kunt Wills claim to know my identity and address.
You're identity is well know.
It's been claimed that you ran off to Canada to avoid prosecution
for crimes involving children. As of my writing this, I've not
received anything to confirm this rumor. Since you have admitted to
being a pedophile (you stated the Iowa Supreme Court said I was wrong
when I stated you weren't likely to be a pedophile), it's not too hard
to believe.
>
>
>> you are a coward yourself. I'll send you my physical address so you
>> can meet ME face to face when you email me with a valid email and IP
>> account.
>
>Post it online coward, or just show the . up at my address,
>which you and Kunt Wills claim to possess from the "police report"
>and "notes" of the phantom meeting.
>
When, outside of your desperate need to lie your way out of this,
has Moe ever claimed, directly or through implication, that she has
any copies?
Your lying about this only serves to further prove you are
desperately trying to shift focus away from the truth that you're a
racist piece of dirt.
>
>> I'm quite willing to see how you really are when you are
>> physically with the person you verbally abuse so hungilly online.
>
>So show up you gutless cunt.
>
She offered to send you her address so that you could visit. You
ran away from the offer like the coward you are.
*IF* the rumor about you running off to Canada, and the reason for
your running, is true, I can understand why you would want to avoid
coming back to the U.S.
Flight to avoid prosecution can't help your case at all.
>
>>
>> So email, me or p rove yoruself the real coward here.
>
>You've got my address (according to the lies you and Kent
>have been spewing), so show up anytime, if you've got
>the spine.
When has Moe claimed to have your address? She hasn't, of
course.
Again your desperation to avoid the truth only serves to harm
you.
>
>>>
>>> And you again confess Kent's and Your lies about "tracing posts"
>>> back to me.
>>
>>
>> You call them lies, but you know very well they were in fact traced
>> back to you.
>
>Prove it, you lying cunt.
Already done approximately six months ago when I posted the
report.
>
>
>> At the time of the racist attacks you were living in
>> Boulder, Colorado,
>
>False.
Prove it. You won't because your lie can never be proved to be
the truth.
>
>> and the posts were traced to that city.
>
>Prove the posts were "traced".
>
Already done. That you admitted the meeting with law enforcement
took place (you stated they took notes) was the proverbial icing on
the cake.
>
>> According to Kent ,
>
>Kent's a pathological mythomaniac and convicted felon.
>
You clearly have no training in psychology of any sort.
What was the nature of the crime you committed that would give
the Iowa Supreme Court reason to claim I was wrong in my belief that
it was unlikely that you were/are a pedophile?
When I stated it was unlikely, you stated the Iowa Supreme Court
says I'm wrong.
>
>> there are only three people on usenet who obsess about him
>> so much that they would take advantage of his vacation period out of
>> the country to spew racist death threats against him and his family.
>
>Why would someone wait until Kent was "out of the country" to
>make these purported "racist death threats", eh moe?
My theory is that you thought I hadn't left and that by allowing
your vile racist views to come forth, you could get me to post.
As with so much of your life, you failed.
>
>A "threat" ain't much good if it doesn't make it to the recipient,
>now is it moe?
Are you so stupid that you think the server I used wouldn't have
the posts available after two weeks?
>
>> You thought by the time he returned the racist posts you made would no
>> longer be traceable to the city where you live,
>
>You're projecting your pig-ignorance and false assumptions
>about the internet again, and the more you do, the more it
>appears you were involved in the forged spew.
Your LYING about Moe having copies of anything regarding the
police report helps prove you're desperate to hide the truth that you
made the racist threats.
>
>
>> You were wrong.
>
>This from the clueless cunt who has no idea about
>the form or function of basic internet protocols.
Moe's not well versed in "Internet Plumbing." She's never claimed
she is.
Others are.
>
>> I kept you under your racist act busy posting,
>
>Funny thing moe, since you were the only one
>who was online contemporaneously with these
>"racist death threats", and the only idiot stupid
>enough to (pretend) to engage such obvious
>trolling forgeries.
Prove they were forgeries. You won't because you can't.
>
>
>> obtaining more than enough examples for someone
>> who knows how to trace repeatedly back to the
>> source-- you.
>
>Again your delusions and false assumptions about the
>function of usenet/intenet protocols belies your involvement
>in the racist spews.
I seriously doubt Moe was involved in your racist threats. Feel
free to offer something to support your belief that she was somehow
helping you.
>
>> And you recently made the mistake of saying the police
>> that visitied you took notes while they talked with you
>
>You're lying again cunt. Kent has made the false claims
>that 1) any "talk" too place,
Yet you have stated notes were taken.
>2) he was sent copies of the police "notes"
Actually, the report with some notes made at a later time. The
notes are from another officer confirming what was written in the
report.
>and that 3) he has a copy of the "police report".
>
Do you recall tjab bitching about your address being censored in
the scan I made available?
>All he has to do is post them if he has them ... but you know
>damn well he's lying once again.
>
Why do you pretend like you didn't see the scan of the report?
While I can't KNOW you did, to presume you didn't would be a foolish
presumption.
>
>> -- a detail
>> that was not revealed before. Which, BTW contradicted your claim that
>> the local police never paid your a visit over this matter. You proved
>> yourself to be a liar.
>
>The only thing proven every time you post is just how utterly ignorant
>you are, and what a pathological liar you are.
Everyone is ignorant of a great many things. Only your limited
intellect would see calling someone ignorant as an insult.
As of my writing this, you've yet to prove Moe lied about this
matter. You, however, have lied and claimed she has copies of a
report no one has claimed she has.
>
>
>> You can deny all you want, call us liars and cunts until your
>> trollish fingers bleed, and ryto deride me with shit-eating references
>> all you want.
>
>OK, roger that.
>
>> In the end you show more of what you are than anything I
>> nor Kent can say. And G-d knows what you try to hide. I wouldn't want
>> to be you when that time comes, Eric.
>
>Who's "Eric", eh cunt?
>
You.
Even if we pretend your name isn't Eric, you know that is the name
many use to reference you. Why do you dishonestly pretend like you
don't know this? Is it a symptom of a greater mental problem?
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk5U1@mid.individual.net> |