"I Am The Stig" wrote in news:48e9ac0e$0$22565
$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:
>
> "David Moss" wrote in message
> news:Xns9B2FA1C676E82q0320811mailconnectu@61.9.191.5...
>> "Me" wrote in
>> news:48e88c25$0$31803$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
>>
>>> No doubt. But my point is there was virtually no security at all.
They
>>> didn't check for alcohol, they didn't check for explosives (imagine a
>>> looney in the belly of the new C-17). It was just 40,000 people
having
>>> fun.
>>
>> You are confusing interfering with people's rights with security.
>> With a little thought you can have one without the other.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Moss
>> Personal opinion only
>> The Australian Politics Resource
>> http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
>
> You mean you can interfere with peoples rights without worrying about
> security? Wow!!!
Sure can, just look at the way the Libs handled the Haneef case.
But it works the other way too. Its possible to achieve good security
with minimal interference with people's rights.
--
David Moss
Personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com |