"TomTom" wrote in message
news:gcekee$fr5$1@news.albasani.net...
> Peter Jason wrote:
>> "TomTom" wrote in message
>> news:gceiet$duu$1@news.albasani.net...
>>> Peter Jason wrote:
>>>> "TomTom" wrote in message
>>>> news:gceh04$ctr$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>>> Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>>> "TomTom" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:gcbn8p$76t$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>>>>> Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stay away from lawyers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very sensible. Stay away from doctors, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> especially when confronted by "matters of
>>>>>>>> principle":
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Absolutely!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this overworked concept caused the
>>>>>>>> 20th century's two world wars,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How did "matters of principle" cause WW1 and WW2?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the Vietnam war,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe, but don't blame lawyers for that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> endless cold-war brawls,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the cold war ended with the disintegration of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> USSR, the description od "endless" seems a tad
>>>>>>> inaccurate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and now all the BS in Asia Minor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which particular BS in Asia Minor do you attribute
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> matters of principle?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have survived to tell thee!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More's the pity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I forgot.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's chronic.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lawyers are the most damnably argumentative lot!
>>>>>
>>>>> That will be $1,500, plus GST, please.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This might be a good time to remove my nom de plume.
>>>> My
>>>> real name is Simon Shallowpocket!
>>>
>>>
>>> That's perfectly all right. My long and detailed legal
>>> advice was carefully crafted to include a fundamental
>>> flaw
>>> which effectively reverses what you wanted to achieve.
>>> When you set it in motion, it will blow up in your face,
>>> metaphorically speaking.
>>
>> I see
>
> No, you don't.
>
>> this a typical ploy
>
> Anything but typical.
>
>> concocted to send me rushing into
>> the arms of some lawyer and engaging him.
>
> No. It means that, unless you pay your debt, the product
> will not do what you want.
>
>> Thereafter you &
>> he will conspire to inflate the contention with the usual
>> result of lawyers' enrichment.
>
> No. That is just your paranoia running away with you.
>
>> But I am aware
>
> Nonsense!
>
>> of these filthy tricks
>
> I do not perform tricks.
>
>> and I retire to the smallest room of the house
>> to give your epistles the attention they deserve!
>
> Who care what you do in your living room?
Are you charging some poor client for the time you spend
demeaning my posts? I'll bet it's all clocked up.
< insert feeble contrived riposte here... >
|