"B J Foster" wrote in message
news:4978e37b$0$32007$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Swampfox wrote:
>> "B J Foster" wrote in message
>> news:4978de7d$0$4046$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> tvaerskaegg@... wrote:
>>>> On 22 Jan, 14:30, true.blue.bl...@... wrote:
>>>>> B J Foster wrote:
>>>>> Swampfox has posted 3 times in this thread without once condemning the
>>>>> pathetic mediaeval cultural beliefs of this .wit mufti.
>>>> The Mufti is actually theologically correct. A Muslim man is allowed
>>>> to beat his wife according to Islam and she does not have the right to
>>>> refuse intercourse with him whenever he demands it except for reasons
>>>> of menstruation or health.
>>>>
>>>> The Mufti is only expounding, quite correctly, what Islam teaches.
>>>>
>>>> Svenne
>>> I couldn't care less about Islamic law, or Christian law or spaghetti
>>> monster law for that matter. I care about Australian law.
>>
>> First intelligent thing you've said in months.
>> All Muslims in Australia are bound by Australian law, as is every other
>> citizen.
>> The good Mr Hamza can say what he likes, makes no difference, the only
>> people getting into a sweat about it are the Musso bashers and the brain
>> dead.
>>
>>
>
> "Under no circumstances is .ual violence permissible or acceptable in
> Australia - under no circumstances"
>
> "Under no circumstances are other forms of violence, physical violence,
> acceptable towards women in Australia nor are they acceptable in my view
> to mainstream Muslim teachings".
>
> "Australia will not tolerate these sort of remarks. They don't belong in
> modern Australia, and he should stand up, repudiate them and apologise".
> (Kevin Rudd)
You don't think a significant proportion of muslimes in AUS don't want
to change all the above?
In the US, a US congressman from Dearbornistan, Michigan recently introduced
legislation that would make all criticism, negative news stories about
pislam
a hate crime.
|