On 9 Apr, 23:15, Alex Heney wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2007 07:39:55 -0700, leaenna_mi...@budweiser.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Alex Heney wrote:
>
> >> Not only is it potentially a lot more permanent than anything merely
> >> spoken, and will reach a much larger audience, but it is also
> >> something which the very nature of writing out means you *should* have
> >> more time to think about what you are saying.
> >> --
> >> Alex Heney, Global Villager
> >> In the land of the witless, the halfwit is king.
>
> >How does it work where the originallibelis repeated?
>
> >A lot of these forum/review type websites have a "quote" facility
> >where you can quote selective passages of a post in order to agree/
> >disagree.
>
> >What if a subsequent poster quoted the review in question along,
> >perhaps, with a comment of "I agree" or "I disagree"?
>
> >Is the subsequent poster in the brown smelly stuff as well?
>
> Potentially, yes.
> --
> Alex Heney, Global Villager
> Warning: Politicians can be hazardous to your wealth.
> To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Interestingly, the author libelled me in return when posting one of
his rants. He said I was "harassing him" which was also "contrary to
UK law" and called me "a man possessed". Utterly untrue, because I
had only posted comments agreeing with what other negative reviewers
had said. This is certainly not harassment.
Has he not undermined his own case by making these accusations against
me? If he serves a writ I will inform my solicitor of these
statements.
|