On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:42:06 +0000, TD wrote:
>
> "FriarTuck" wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.11.01.16.35.53.284446@spammerstheygothehouse.con...
>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:19:30 +0000, TD wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Maria" wrote in message
>>> news:d9rji3dj8p6ubpec97899jpph13gchqpe8@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:59:38 -0000, "TD" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"MM" wrote in message
>>>>>news:a2pji3tghg8u9661cla44kpv3592759jab@4ax.com...
>>>>>> The BBC reports the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "London's police force has been found guilty of breaking health and
>>>>>> safety laws over the shooting dead of innocent Brazilian Jean Charles
>>>>>> de Menezes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Metropolitan Police unnecessarily put the public at risk in
>>>>>> chasing a suspected suicide bomber across the city, an Old Bailey jury
>>>>>> decided."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7069796.stm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MM
>>>>>
>>>>>An abuse of common sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>de Menezes did after all act in an aggressive, threatening, anxious and
>>>>>nervous manner after he was manhandled by a complete stranger on the
>>>>>Tube
>>>>>and had guns pointed at him.
>>>>>
>>>>>The firearms officers had no choice but to kill him - after all, there
>>>>>was
>>>>>no evidence that he wasn't hiding invisible explosives.
>>>>>
>>>>>And, while I cannot speak with any expertise at all on the matter, he
>>>>>had
>>>>>definitely consumed cocaine or something at some point.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TD - I thnk that's the most rattled I've ever seen you. Don't blame
>>>> you though..... scary stuff.
>>>
>>> Rattled? Not at all. I find the whole thing a farce: the circumstances
>>> up
>>> to and including JCdM's death; Ian Blair's letter to the Home Office
>>> saying
>>> he was suspending s17 Police Reform Act 2002; IPCC being denied access to
>>> the scene and evidence for five days; well over two years since his
>>> death,
>>> still no inquest (inquest at Southwark Coroner's Court on 10th December);
>>> the process and outcomes of the Stockwell 2 investigation; no Stockwell 1
>>> report until after inquest; that any normal commuter can be shot, and
>>> there
>>> is nothing that the Met or its supporters think they can or would do
>>> different about it; and so on...
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong with all that though - nothing at all... let's move on.
>>
>> dont you start to see that the way they (tptb and their boot boys) got
>> away with this is the same as the way they may (I suspect it is a distinct
>> possibility) have got away with 9/11...
>
> No, I don't believe the Met were involved in 9/11.
well I did clarify "they" as "tptb and their boot boys", whether "they"
are in any way similar to the "they" of "they live" is open to debate I
reckon....
but the similarity of the dress rehearsal operation going on (like 9/11)
on 7/7 (and adding to confusion) is quite a coincidence don't you think?
So... how often do dress rehearsals occur? once every 2 years? once every
10 years? what is the probability of two terrorist dress rehearsal test
events going on at exactly the same time and place as two actual
"terrorist" events?
My gut feeling is there is some link, whether a spy in the
met/cia/mi5/6/whatever releasing info to terrorists or even arranging it
as cover... ???
|