TD posted
>
>Rattled? Not at all. I find the whole thing a farce: the circumstances up
>to and including JCdM's death; Ian Blair's letter to the Home Office saying
>he was suspending s17 Police Reform Act 2002; IPCC being denied access to
>the scene and evidence for five days; well over two years since his death,
>still no inquest (inquest at Southwark Coroner's Court on 10th December);
>the process and outcomes of the Stockwell 2 investigation; no Stockwell 1
>report until after inquest;
What - they are going to use the *inquest* now as an excuse to hold up
Stockwell one? Where did you hear that?
I wonder what they'll use as their excuse after the inquest. Probably
that people are still talking about the case on uk.legal and they don't
want to prejudice the discussions.
>that any normal commuter can be shot, and there
>is nothing that the Met or its supporters think they can or would do
>different about it; and so on...
>
>Nothing wrong with all that though - nothing at all... let's move on.
>
Move along ... Nothing to see here!
--
PeteM
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|