"PeteM" wrote in message
news:WmORoJAtdgKHFwWe@embankment.org...
> TD posted
>>
>>Rattled? Not at all. I find the whole thing a farce: the circumstances
>>up
>>to and including JCdM's death; Ian Blair's letter to the Home Office
>>saying
>>he was suspending s17 Police Reform Act 2002; IPCC being denied access to
>>the scene and evidence for five days; well over two years since his death,
>>still no inquest (inquest at Southwark Coroner's Court on 10th December);
>>the process and outcomes of the Stockwell 2 investigation; no Stockwell 1
>>report until after inquest;
>
> What - they are going to use the *inquest* now as an excuse to hold up
> Stockwell one? Where did you hear that?
Well, I'm wrong:
"It is vital now that the right lessons are learnt and the public can have
confidence in the measures taken by the police to combat the threat of
suicide terrorism. The IPCC has already obtained support from the Coroner
to publish our report before the inquest and we hope to be able to do so
within days."
> I wonder what they'll use as their excuse after the inquest. Probably
> that people are still talking about the case on uk.legal and they don't
> want to prejudice the discussions.
>
>
>>that any normal commuter can be shot, and there
>>is nothing that the Met or its supporters think they can or would do
>>different about it; and so on...
>>
>>Nothing wrong with all that though - nothing at all... let's move on.
>>
>
> Move along ... Nothing to see here!
>
> --
> PeteM
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
|