Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Re: Penalising downloaders Posted on: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:12:37 +0000 (UTC)


"Cynic" wrote in message
news:gtkdt3du8haance0090lh33bs893v6sndv@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:11:52 -0000, "Norman Wells"
> wrote:

> So even with no royalties being paid by consumers whatsoever,
> musicians who can record sufficient songs to keep just 3 of them
> popular at any time will be earning an extremely good livlihood from
> radio stations alone.

It's not a question of just recording sufficient songs in a sort of scatter
gun approach, ie the more they record the more will get played. There's a
question of quality too.

And even a major recording artist would be overjoyed to have 3 tracks
popular at any one time, let alone every week of a long career.

Your business model is fatally flawed.

1471785. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471788. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471791. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471811. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471819. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471828. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471841. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471846. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471874. Re: Penalising downloaders
1471878. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474151. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474198. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474204. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474220. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474225. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474262. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474268. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474272. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474276. Re: Penalising downloaders
1474298. Re: Penalising downloaders