On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:45:26 -0700 (PDT), lisabartal@hotmail.com
wrote:
>On Mar 12, 12:07 pm, Ian wrote:
>> On 12 Mar, 11:54, The Todal wrote:
>>
>> > I'm afraid I find you to be what the lawyers call "an unreliable
>> > historian", meaning that even if you are trying hard to be accurate it
>> > would be unwise to believe you unless you can corroborate your statements.
>>
>> I think we also have to ask how her uncorroborated statements here
>> differ from those we might expect from a woman in deep denial.
>>
>> Ian
>
>Interesting answers peps.
>
>No denial here. Oh and yes, I am by occupation an historian.
>It is not my role in life to explain things to the public that either
>they can not understand or choose not to understand- in other words,
>be in denial about. The numbers of people falsely convicted in the UK
>is alarmingly high. We have a government that clicks it's heels at
>the feet of the tabloids, which cater to the lowest common
>denominator. The lowest common denominator believes this is all about
>child protection- which all would agree is a good thing. But the
>number of children damaged through this illegal and ill founded
>exercise is higher than the number protected. As I have said on
>television, "I can not think of a single child better off because of
>operation ore. The real question that has to be answered, is what was
>the REAL objective?
The REAL objective, as with most of the activity in which the British
system of "justice" prevails, is to create fear.
MM |