"MM" wrote in message
news:uqmft3hoqkrtg21lfocptao51hilkqpcog@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:45:26 -0700 (PDT), lisabartal@hotmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 12, 12:07 pm, Ian wrote:
>>> On 12 Mar, 11:54, The Todal wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm afraid I find you to be what the lawyers call "an unreliable
>>> > historian", meaning that even if you are trying hard to be accurate it
>>> > would be unwise to believe you unless you can corroborate your
>>> > statements.
>>>
>>> I think we also have to ask how her uncorroborated statements here
>>> differ from those we might expect from a woman in deep denial.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>
>>Interesting answers peps.
>>
>>No denial here. Oh and yes, I am by occupation an historian.
>>It is not my role in life to explain things to the public that either
>>they can not understand or choose not to understand- in other words,
>>be in denial about. The numbers of people falsely convicted in the UK
>>is alarmingly high. We have a government that clicks it's heels at
>>the feet of the tabloids, which cater to the lowest common
>>denominator. The lowest common denominator believes this is all about
>>child protection- which all would agree is a good thing. But the
>>number of children damaged through this illegal and ill founded
>>exercise is higher than the number protected. As I have said on
>>television, "I can not think of a single child better off because of
>>operation ore. The real question that has to be answered, is what was
>>the REAL objective?
>
> The REAL objective, as with most of the activity in which the British
> system of "justice" prevails, is to create fear.
I really don't think so.
I think the real objective was to mine that "ore" for convictions - the more
the better, to make it look as if they were having huge success.
|