Mike_Bafter his three day drunk wrote :
> In message , Baldoni
> writes
>>Mike_B laid this down on his screen :
>>> In message , Baldoni
>>> writes
>>>>Cynic wrote on 20/03/2008 :
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Baldoni wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe pigs piss champagne.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would gladly pump a few slugs into Glitters head !
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that because you believe that murder is *so* much less
>>>>> reprehensible than his crimes?
>>>>
>>>>I don't get into the technicalities of these things. But I would have no
>>>> problem shooting Glitter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then as you clearly believe that wrong-doing should entail the ultimate
>>> punishment, you would presumably also agree that you should be killed once
>>> you have carried out this act?
>>
>>If I was apprehended by the police and they shot me then I would find it
>> acceptable and part of the territory. However I do not believe in the
>> State using the death penalty as a means of punishment.
>>
>
> Why would the police apprehend and shoot you other than as punishment?
> You think it would right for you to be killed for your crime, but only if an
> individual did it, not the state?
Glitter has crossed the line and done the unaceptable. He would not be
missed. I imagine he would find it impossible to stay undetected in
this country for long.
--
Count Baldoni
|