Mike_B explained :
> In message , Baldoni
> writes
>>Mike_Bafter his three day drunk wrote :
>>> In message , Baldoni
>>> writes
>>>>Mike_B laid this down on his screen :
>>>>> In message , Baldoni
>>>>> writes
>>>>>>Cynic wrote on 20/03/2008 :
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Baldoni wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe pigs piss champagne.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would gladly pump a few slugs into Glitters head !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that because you believe that murder is *so* much less
>>>>>>> reprehensible than his crimes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't get into the technicalities of these things. But I would have
>>>>>> no problem shooting Glitter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Then as you clearly believe that wrong-doing should entail the ultimate
>>>>> punishment, you would presumably also agree that you should be killed
>>>>> once you have carried out this act?
>>>>
>>>>If I was apprehended by the police and they shot me then I would find it
>>>> acceptable and part of the territory. However I do not believe in the
>>>> State using the death penalty as a means of punishment.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would the police apprehend and shoot you other than as punishment?
>>> You think it would right for you to be killed for your crime, but only if
>>> an individual did it, not the state?
>>
>>Glitter has crossed the line and done the unaceptable. He would not be
>> missed. I imagine he would find it impossible to stay undetected in this
>> country for long.
>>
>
> So sleeping with underage people crosses the line and is unacceptable, but
> murder is fine? I'm just trying to get a handle on your value system.
All I am saying is that it would not be a bad thing to shoot a nonce
like Glitter.
I am not advocating going around and shooting any Tom, Dick or Harry.
--
Count Baldoni
|