On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:37:28 GMT, Mike_B
wrote:
>In message , Baldoni
> writes
>>Mike_Bafter his three day drunk wrote :
>>> In message , Baldoni
>>> writes
>>>>Mike_B laid this down on his screen :
>>>>> In message , Baldoni
>>>>> writes
>>>>>>Cynic wrote on 20/03/2008 :
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Baldoni wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe pigs piss champagne.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would gladly pump a few slugs into Glitters head !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that because you believe that murder is *so* much less
>>>>>>> reprehensible than his crimes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't get into the technicalities of these things. But I would
>>>>>>have no problem shooting Glitter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Then as you clearly believe that wrong-doing should entail the
>>>>>ultimate punishment, you would presumably also agree that you
>>>>>should be killed once you have carried out this act?
>>>>
>>>>If I was apprehended by the police and they shot me then I would find
>>>>it acceptable and part of the territory. However I do not believe
>>>>in the State using the death penalty as a means of punishment.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would the police apprehend and shoot you other than as punishment?
>>> You think it would right for you to be killed for your crime, but
>>>only if an individual did it, not the state?
>>
>>Glitter has crossed the line and done the unaceptable. He would not be
>>missed. I imagine he would find it impossible to stay undetected in
>>this country for long.
>>
>
>So sleeping with underage people crosses the line and is unacceptable,
>but murder is fine? I'm just trying to get a handle on your value
>system.
I'd take issue with the word "system". Mental chaos, more like.
Trouble is, "Baldoni" may well be in a position of authority.
MM |