On 22 Mar, 19:02, "Janitor of Lunacy" wrote:
>O'Gara has no answer for thishttp://www.execulink.com/~kbrannen/tracey.htm
> demolition of his theory
====================================================
I've never met Billy Tracey and I rarely mention him. The core facts
of the Yorkshire Ripper cover up, as presented above in this thread,
still stand regardless of what is said about Billy Tracey, and you
have no convincing answer to the core facts of the Yorkshire Ripper
cover up.
Tyre marks and boot marks at the murder scenes could belong to anyone,
as these were places where lovers parked and where numerous
prostitutes took their punters.
The following is from the Google Groups archive:
====================================================
WILLIAM TRACEY
......... ........A crucial question for me is: why has William Tracey
not sued Noel
O'Gara for libel?
He has nothing to lose and everything to gain - if he is not the
Yorkshire Ripper.
He'd be risking an order to pay Noel O'Gara's legal costs, but that
wouldn't bother Tracey.
The advantage would be to prove his innocence, and to save himself
from
being lynched by a thousand angry women as awareness spreads that
Peter
Sutcliffe is not the Ripper and that the Ripper has been
intentionally
left free to go on killing women for the past twenty-five years.
So again, WHY has William Tracey not come forward loudly proclaiming
his innocence and suing Noel O'Gara for libel?
Why did William Tracey drop out of sight in 1984?
These are detached, impartial questions about William Tracey, from
someone who has no particular interest in proving William Tracey is
the
Yorkshire Ripper.
========================================================== |