Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]

Subject: Re: Reasons why Steve Wright should appeal his conviction as the Ipswich murderer Posted on: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:39:50 GMT

Janitor of Lunacy used his keyboard to write :
> "Baldoni" wrote in message
> news:mn.b4567d833f3cbe7d.81063@gmail.com...
>> Noel O'Gara explained on 22/03/2008 :
>>> Lets give Wright the benefit of the doubt and weigh up the evidence
>>> against him.
>>> It is clear that he had connections to all the victims either through
>>> his clothes, his flat or his car.
>>> But was there anything to connect him to the locations where he was
>>> alleged to have dumped the bodies. Surely a man carrying a dead body
>>> into a woods would leave footprints and car tracks on the side of the
>>> road which were clearly visible on tv when the last two bodies were
>>> found. There had been heavy rain at the time.
>>
>> A man that knows exactly what he he doing can leave a body in the woods
>> without fear of his actions being traced back to him. I doubt very much
>> that Wright had any of this knowledge.
>
> Ian Huntley managed quite successfully not to leave any trace where he dumped
> his victims; and O'Gara's argument is blown out of the water by "there had
> been heavy rain at the time". That's normally enough to severely compromise
> traces of presence.

I thought Huntley had to change the tyres on his vehicle. This is why
I mentioned the need for about 3 vehicles.

--
Count Baldoni