Daveafter his three day drunk wrote :
> "Noel O'Gara" wrote in message
> news:940ffd49-36f5-4609-9b75-a518265109ca@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> First and foremost Wright, who always proclaimed his innocence put his
>> trust in British justice and his legal advisors just as the Birmingham
>> 6, Stefan Kiszko and so many other convicted persons did before him.
>> The average English person has been brain washed over the years by
>> their media that British justice is infallible and only the guilty get
>> convicted. Wright was a victim of that syndrome.
>> He foolishly believed that the judge would surely see that there was
>> no case against him because he accepted that his DNA might be on all
>> of the victims because he had had intimate .ual relations with all
>> of them and he freely admitted that.
>> But did that make him the killer of all these victims?
>> Wright always believed that the police had made a terrible mistake and
>> it would be realised at his trial and he would be exhonerated.
>>
>> Lets give Wright the benefit of the doubt and weigh up the evidence
>> against him.
>> It is clear that he had connections to all the victims either through
>> his clothes, his flat or his car.
>> But was there anything to connect him to the locations where he was
>> alleged to have dumped the bodies. Surely a man carrying a dead body
>> into a woods would leave footprints and car tracks on the side of the
>> road which were clearly visible on tv when the last two bodies were
>> found. There had been heavy rain at the time.
>> The police suggested that he had an accomplice. Could that be because
>> they found footprints but they didnt match his? Would they reveal or
>> conceal that at the trial?
>> Wright's fate was sealed from the start because he had an absolutely
>> useless and inept lawyer defending him.
>>
>> Langdale said at the outset of the trial that he would not challenge
>> the DNA evidence.
>> That must have been music to the ears of the prosecution and the
>> police who had DNA low copy number profiles found on some of the
>> victims bodies.
>>
>> Langdale, as soon as the verdict was returned, made a plea that Wright
>> be given no more than 30 years in jail because he would not be a
>> danger to the public then.
>> He said that before even consulting his client who was in shock at the
>> prospect of life in jail. His request to the judge showed that he
>> always believed that Wright was guilty and still he pretended to
>> defend him. Thats why I say that Wright had no chance from the start.
>>
>> Low copy number DNA was exposed as fraudulent and fabricated in the
>> recent Omagh bomb trial of Sean Hoey.
>> The Ipswich police told the lie after the conviction that Wright was
>> identified because the DNA found on the victims was matched with his
>> DNA profile on the national DNA database.
>>
>> I emphasise that was highlighted by police after the verdict and it
>> was a lie because Wright was a suspect from early on in the
>> investigation and was interviewed twice and his details taken then
>> which were checked up on the criminal records office and revealed that
>> they had his DNA profile because of a previous crime of theft of
>> money.
>>
>> It was a lie to say that the DNA was the vital break that put him in
>> the spotlight.
>>
>> He had been a suspect from early on because he was one of a few dozen
>> regular punters in the small town of Ipswich which had no more than a
>> dozen or so prostitutes standing in groups of two or three at any time
>> within sight of a single street corner at the football stadium.
>> This was not the west end of London or Chapeltown Leeds or even Lumb
>> Lane in Bradford, this was small town Ipswich where the hookers knew
>> each other and most of the few dozen regular punters were known by all
>> the girls and talked about amongst themselves. Wright was such a
>> regular and known to most of them as a . case, just a guy who wanted
>> straight . and paid for it like the vast majority of punters.
>>
>> Another party, shop worker and ex cop Tom Stephens was known to them
>> also and he had admitted that he was in love with Tania, the little
>> dark one who was abducted and missing first.
>>
>> Is it any wonder that Wright is looking for a new lawyer?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Wright has been found guilty....Get over it.
>
> Dave.
Do you know I thought at first this discussion was about the Radio 2 DJ
Steve Wright of "Steve Wright In The Afternoon" and TOTP2.
Having looked at the case I myself think it is wright that rite was
sent down. A lifetime of sharpened toothbrushes stuck betwixed his
ribs, and the water in those boilers on those landings are ever so hot
and when the sugar is added it sticks to a mans face burning it red
raw. He will think the QEII was like a row boat on The Serpentine in
comparison.
--
Count Baldoni
|