"Noel O'Gara" wrote in message
news:b4ac5dea-50bc-4839-bc77-12a6db18ebda@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Snipped the rant.......
> Dodgy forensic evidence such as Low copy number DNA which is
> fraudulent.
Low copy number DNA is not *fraudulent*, it may be *flawed* because it's
a relatively new science but that was not the sum total amount of
evidence used in the case.
> A man I know who had found vital evidence and he was told to get lost
> because Wright had been arrested already.
Care to name this person or is this more of your deranged rants?
For the record, Peter Turtill claimed he knew the real killer, had his
computer kit taken away and not returned to date, he's whinging about
this in a few news groups. If he *did* know the real killer and bearing
in mind this person's penchant for seeking "cash rewards", why was there
no "evidence" in his memoirs / on his computer?
> The Madeleine McCann libel case has exposed the British media for the
> liars that they really are.
Wrong again. Certain tabloids libelled the McCann's because they have
the mistaken idea that they can (a) get away with it and (b) it sells
newspapers. If you genuinely believe all you read in UK newspapers then
you are an idiot, period!
Are you not in Contempt of Court posting this garbage?
|