Alex Heney wrote:
> > The Joes, the Heneys, the Tims don't want to believe it, because it
> > makes their argument look rather silly.
> >
>
> It does absolutely no such thing.
>
> The only reason I have for not believing it is that it seems very
> unlikely to me.
>
> If somebody can show reference to any properly conducted survey or
> statistical site which backs up those numbers, I will happily accept
> them.
Someone posted this to 'prove' their point. Sections 22 and 23 are
quite relevant, that is as far as I have read, the situation we seem to
be talking about is history, not current which was my understanding.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmtreasy/1717
/1717.pdf
--
|