ENGLAND IS NOT A DEMOCRACY
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Begin transcript of essence of judgment by Mr. Justice King:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No.
7MA90367
QUEEN=92S BENCH DIVISION
MANCHESTER DISTRICT REGISTRY
Before: The Honorable Mr. Justice King
Date: 10 March 2008
BETWEEN:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM GREGG Claimant
-and-
NOEL O=92GARA Defendant
--------------------------
ORDER
--------------------------
UPON application by the Claimant pursuant to CPR r.24.2 dated 13
November 2007
AND UPON HEARING Counsel for the Claimant and the Defendant having
represented himself
IT IS ORDERED that:
1) Judgment be entered in favour of the Claimant and against the
Defendant on the whole of the claim.
2) An injunction be granted restraining the Defendant whether by
himself, his servants or agents or otherwise howsoever from publishing
or causing to be published the words complained of in this claim or
any similar words defamatory of the Claimant.
3) Damages be assessed at 50,000 pounds payable by the Defendant
within twelve weeks of the date of this Order.
4) The Defendant=92s application for permission to appeal the above
orders is refused.
5) The Defendant do pay the Claimant=92s costs of the action to be
subject to detailed assessment and the Defendant do pay 10,000 pounds
on account of those costs within 28 days of the date of this Order.
6) The Defendant=92s application for a stay of all the above orders
pending an application for permission for him to appeal is refused.
Dated the 10th day of March 2008
By the Court
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of transcript of essence of judgment by Mr. Justice King (E&OE).
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
For those who want to face up to it, the case of Noel O=92Gara v. Chris
Gregg epitomizes all that is wrong with England and its so-called
justice system.
There is no freedom of expression in England.
As holder of dual British-Irish citizenship, I claim to right to
freedom of expression under the British Human Rights Act and the
European Convention on Human Rights which is the basis of that Act.
That means I have the freedom under British and European law to say
that John Humble was framed, because that is where all the evidence
points.
I have listened repeatedly to the recordings of the Yorkshire Ripper
tape posted to ACC George Oldfield in 1979, alongside recordings of
John Humble=92s voice. It is clear to me that these are the voices of
two different men. Add to that the fact that John Humble=92s handwriting
is a world away from the handwriting of the letters sent to George
Oldfield in 1979.
John Humble was convicted solely on the strength of his confession.
The technology exists to prove with independent verification whether
or not his voice was the voice on the tape of 1979. Handwriting
analysis is now a sophisticated science. Yet no such evidence was
presented at John Humble=92s trial, by either the prosecution or the
defence.
Everything hinged on a confession.
Just as everything hinged on Stefan Kiszko=92s =93confession,=94 Gerry
Conlon=92s =93confession,=94 Judith Ward=92s =93confession=94=85. and so on=
=85=85
The evidence is overwhelming that John Humble was NOT the author of
the letters and tape of 1979.
So what is Chris Gregg playing at?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------
Back in the 1980s, we often had to ask the following question:
=93IS THIS PERSON A FOOL OR AN INFILTRATOR?=94
Gill Langley and Richard Ryder were clearly professional infiltrators,
as were Terry Hunt and Carole Hayman=85...
However, when it came to lesser players such as Robert Sharpe, Mark
Gold, etc=85.. I had to ask that question:
=93IS HE A FOOL OR AN INFILTRATOR?=94
Robert Sharpe knew what the script was. Whether he was a paid,
professional infiltrator, I don=92t know and I=92m not interested in
finding out.
As for Mark Gold, he was of limited intelligence, just a junior
clerk, and he knew approximately what was required of him, although he
blundered badly in a certain letter he wrote about me in 1986, and he
paid for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------------
Now fast forward to Chris Gregg.
=93IS HE A FOOL OR AN INFILTRATOR?=94
Gregg must be one or the other, because John Humble is innocent of the
charge on which he has been convicted, as any impartial observer can
see. John Humble obviously is not the author of the letters and tape
sent to George Oldfield in 1979 in connection with the Yorkshire
Ripper case.
Conclusion: Chris Gregg is either a fool or an infiltrator.
As holder of dual British-Irish citizenship, I claim the right to
freedom of expression under the Human Rights Act, which gives me the
right to speak the truth as the evidence shows it, especially in a
case like this =96 the Yorkshire Ripper cover up and its bloody legacy
of fear and shame and death and heartbreak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------
This is not over. There is a court in Europe where Greek, Romanian,
Slovenian, Bulgarian, Polish judges are among the adjudicators. These
judges are not controlled by the British ruling group, and Britain=92s
courts already have been given a red face and pulled back into line on
many occasions by that higher court.
See also:
http://yorkshireripper.com/libel%20action%20by%20Chris%20Gregg.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------
-Peter Newman, Harrogate, North Yorkshire
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------------- |