On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:11:51 GMT, Mike_B
wrote:
>In message , Alex Heney
> writes
>>On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:31:35 GMT, Mike_B
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In message , MM
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is not a
>>>>>>legal requirement to obtain a b/a, yet 2.8 million are being
>>>>>>inconvenienced or worse without one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Most of those because they choose to be so inconvenienced.
>>>>
>>>>Please try not to be so stupidly arrogant. Very many low earners in
>>>>the socially divisive Britain brought about through almost eleven
>>>>years of Blairism DO NOT GET A CHOICE!
>>>>
>>>
>>>I wouldn't bother. Both Alex and Joe have already been quite open that
>>>their views are based on no evidence whatsoever other than their own
>>>feelings. They appear to have no knowledge of whole sectors of society
>>>that remain financially excluded and have taken the position that their
>>>lack of knowledge of it means that it doesn't exist. It's pointless
>>>letting views formed in that way annoy you.
>>
>>Now, would you care to make a post which has some basis in reality,
>>rather than your fantasy about what we think?
>>
>
>We? Since joe accepted the accuracy of my assessment, and all you have
>posted was that you found the figures hard to believe then I think you
>may protest too much.
>
OK, there was *some* semblance of reality in the first sentence only
of what you posted, although even there, by the time you posted that,
we had already found a number of sets of figures which appeared to
support our view.
The rest of your post was pure fantasy.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Computer Lie #1: You'll never use all that disk space.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |