Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Subject: Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees Posted on: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:21:04 +0000

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:24:00 GMT, Mike_B
wrote:

>In message , Cynic
> writes
>>On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:06:33 +0000, Alang
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>It is quite interesting to note, not one person has been able to supply
>>>>evidence of even one person who is legally entitled to live in this
>>>>country, being unable to open a bank account
>>>>
>>>>http://www.ukbankaccounts.co.uk/
>>>
>>>Possibly because those who could provide evidence would be barred from
>>>discussing it. The only others who could provide evidence would be
>>>those unable to open an account and how many of those are following
>>>this thread.
>>
>>If the figure is as high as claimed, someone following this thread
>>will at least *know* someone in that position.
>>
>
>I'm staggered by this thread, in which all of the ney sayers are relying
>entirely on an instinctive feeling based on the experience of their own
>circle.

And I am absolutely staggered that you can suggest that, given the
many posts in this thread.


Why on earth are you making that ridiculous claim?

It certainly started out with several of us just saying we didn't find
the figures believable. But then both Joe and I at least have posted
links to later surveys showing that those figures are indeed no longer
correct.

Incidentally, I said all along that although I found the figures
unlikely, I would accept them if it could be shown they were arrived
at by reasonably authoritative means.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
If it glows don't touch it!
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom