gatt wrote:
>
> "Reality_Check)" wrote in message
> news:64ql46F2d55spU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> > > > > And, what do you know. Absolutely nobody was hurt and the
> > > > > passengers didn't even know anything happened.
> > > >
> > > > Millions of convicted felons possess firearms every year, and
> > > > millions of citizens don't get hurt by them, and don't even
> > > > know they possess the firearms.
> > >
> > > So if nobody's getting hurt by all those millions of guns, it's
> > > not a problem, is it?
> >
> >
> > Nope, no reason to deny millions of convicted felons and mentally
> > ill individuals the right to keep and bear arms, and arms, any
> > damn time or place they desire.
>
> If they're not hurting anybody with 'em, it's not a problem, is it?
>
> > Even as passengers on airplanes.
>
> I don't know who said that. Wasn't me.
Seems a bit harsh, to expect passengers to cut both their own arms off,
just to fly. |