john smith wrote in message
news:_P0Gj.16572$jH5.13283@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
> Hi there!
>
> Just wondering if anyone had any ideas why there have been no recent news
> items about the "extensive" investigation into the Jersey children's home
> scandal? Google news dates the last item as the 7th March, and I've read
> nothing about it in the Sunday papers, let alone heard anything on the TV
> news...
>
> I know the disappearance and discovery of Shannon Matthews took up a lot
of
> column inches, but surely the Jersey story is potentially equally big
news?
> Something smells a bit fishy, if you ask me...
>
> Just curious!
> jay
>
>
>
a/ It is now the tourist season
b/ "The vast majority of those are animal bones, a few are outstanding, but
there is nothing that the anthropologist has identified as human" is
probably sonmething to do with it.
The human skull is now probably identified as say 17th century and the
original declared dog bones, found there years ago, have probably been
reconfirmed as dog bones.
The rest is just strict regime children's home of that era.
ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
|