"Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )"
posted
>a/ It is now the tourist season
Possibly there was an injunction, or a warning of contempt of court
proceedings. The reporting did stop *very* suddenly.
>b/ "The vast majority of those are animal bones, a few are
>outstanding, but there is nothing that the anthropologist has
>identified as human" is probably sonmething to do with it. The human
>skull is now probably identified as say 17th century and the original
>declared dog bones, found there years ago, have probably been
>reconfirmed as dog bones. The rest is just strict regime children's
>home of that era.
This is what I guessed, but I haven't seen anything admitted publicly
yet. I did notice they backtracked about the "torture shackles", which
were later admitted to be something to do with animals.
Last I heard the police were still digging. They're probably nearly at
Guernsey by now :)
--
Les Invalides |