On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:55:16 +0000, Les Invalides
wrote:
>"Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )"
> posted
>>a/ It is now the tourist season
>
>Possibly there was an injunction, or a warning of contempt of court
>proceedings. The reporting did stop *very* suddenly.
>
>>b/ "The vast majority of those are animal bones, a few are
>>outstanding, but there is nothing that the anthropologist has
>>identified as human" is probably sonmething to do with it. The human
>>skull is now probably identified as say 17th century and the original
>>declared dog bones, found there years ago, have probably been
>>reconfirmed as dog bones. The rest is just strict regime children's
>>home of that era.
>
>This is what I guessed, but I haven't seen anything admitted publicly
>yet. I did notice they backtracked about the "torture shackles", which
>were later admitted to be something to do with animals.
>
>Last I heard the police were still digging. They're probably nearly at
>Guernsey by now :)
...which is good, because Guernsey was also under suspicion.
MM |