On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:26:38 +0000, Cynic
wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:28:08 +0100, "tim \(not at home\)"
> wrote:
>
>>> And how the heck would a bank know whether or not its customer "moves
>>> around a lot"? IME people who are "travellers" have a fixed address
>>> that they use for corespondance.
>>
>>I assume that he was referring to people that can't come up with the
>>necessary "proof of address" (less than three months old).
>
>IME travellers have no problem with providing "proof" of address. The
>other group would be the homeless and people living in hostels and
>B&Bs provided by social care.
What is 'social care'?
And why do you think it provides hostels and B&Bs?
> I can believe that few of those people
>would have a bank account - or any need for one. But I would not
>regard such people as living in a "household" nor that they form any
>significant proportion of the population.
That's something we don't know unless you have the results of a survey |