On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:00:35 +0000, judith
wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:51:06 +0000, MM wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:58:55 +1300, "Jonny"
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Andy" wrote in message
>>>news:c4a43d0c-ed47-4fce-8a10-6574b97931dd@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>>>>I am not against the idea of ID cards per-se , but I am seriously
>>>> worried about the cross-linking of them with government (and worse,
>>>> third party) databases.
>>>
>>>Id cards wouldn't be necessary if you had a half pie efficient government.
>>>It's pretty outrageous that the british government has so little clue about
>>>who is in the country. You are an Island nation like us (New Zealand), so
>>>simply make use of this advantage to secure your borders and ID cards won't
>>>be necessary.
>>
>>Yes, but you could count all the people in NZ in an afternoon.
>>
>>MM
>
>Is the number different from those there in a morning?
There are always people dying and new ones getting born.
Immigrants. Emigrants |
1479221. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479236. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479243. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479303. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479338. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479341. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479398. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479399. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479493. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479542. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479719. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479727. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479737. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479949. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479968. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480014. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480172. Re: ID cards, my personal view
|
|
|